Search Header Logo
  1. Resource Library
  2. Social Studies
  3. Civics & Government
  4. Us Supreme Court Landmark Cases
  5. Wrapping Up The Supreme Court Cases
Wrapping up the Supreme Court Cases

Wrapping up the Supreme Court Cases

Assessment

Presentation

•

Social Studies

•

10th Grade

•

Practice Problem

•

Easy

Created by

Jayme Pieretti

Used 4+ times

FREE Resource

2 Slides • 12 Questions

1

January 12, 2024


Quizlet.live

2

Poll

How would you describe your understanding of the Supreme Court cases?

I am lost

I kind of understand them, but could use some more help.

I've got these.

3

Mr. Pieretti

What Court Cases do we have to finish?

4

Poll

How would you describe your understanding of the Supreme Court cases?

I am lost

I kind of understand them, but could use some more help.

I've got these.

5

Open Ended

How does this case impact you?

6

Multiple Choice

Students have free speech as long as it is not disruptive or promoting illegal activities.

1

Marbury v Madison

2

McDonald v Chicago

3

US v Nixon

4

Tinker v Des Moines

7

Multiple Choice

Federalism and the 14th Amendment means that States have to abide by federal protections, like the 2nd Amendment.

1

Marbury v Madison

2

McDonald v Chicago

3

US v Nixon

4

Tinker v Des Moines

8

Multiple Choice

The OG case that gave the Supreme Court the power of judicial review

1

Marbury v Madison

2

McDonald v Chicago

3

US v Nixon

4

Tinker v Des Moines

9

Multiple Choice

14th Amendment - Presidents aren't above the law.

Separation of powers - Presidents can't interfere with court cases

Executive privilege doesn't apply to everything.

1

Marbury v Madison

2

McDonald v Chicago

3

US v Nixon

4

Tinker v Des Moines

10

Multiple Choice

Police need probable cause. School administration only needs reasonable suspicion.

1

New Jersey v TLO

2

Baker v Carr

3

Miranda v Arizona

4

Brown v Board

11

Multiple Choice

Segregation in Schools violates the 14th Amendment.

1

New Jersey v TLO

2

Baker v Carr

3

Miranda v Arizona

4

Brown v Board

12

Multiple Choice

1 person, 1 vote. Federal Courts can ensure redistricting happens. They cannot get involved in what that redistricting looks like (gerrymandering).

1

New Jersey v TLO

2

Baker v Carr

3

Miranda v Arizona

4

Brown v Board

13

Multiple Choice

You have the right to remain silent, anything you say or do can be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you.

1

New Jersey v TLO

2

Baker v Carr

3

Miranda v Arizona

4

Brown v Board

14

Poll

How would you describe your understanding of the Supreme Court cases?

I am lost

I kind of understand them, but could use some more help.

I've got these.

pattern-tertiary

January 12, 2024


Quizlet.live

Show answer

Auto Play

Slide 1 / 14

SLIDE