Cite strong and thorough evidence to support an analysis of what the text says explicitly

Determine where the text leaves matters uncertain

Cite strong and thorough evidence to support inferences drawn from the text

"Was born in New York City but spent her early years living with her maternal grandmother in Barbados"

"Committed to education and social justice"

"Representing New York from 1969-1983"

"She served seven terms in Congress, during which time she was a vocal opponent of social injustice"

Defense spending is an investment into the educational needs of our youth

Defense spending is a misuse of funds

Defense spending is necessary sometimes

Defense spending takes away from other branches of the military

Chisholm employs inductive reasoning when she notices the pattern of Nixon's peaceful strategies and concludes that the administration is doing well

Chisholm employs deductive reasoning, not inductive. She concludes that defense funds are misused

Chisholm employs inductive reasoning by noticing patterns of focus on defense methods. She concludes that the administration is not going to focus on educational needs

None of the above

"I have never cared much about what people say"

"We have waited to see what the new administration is going to do"

"Apparently launching those new programs can be delayed for awhile"

"It seems we have to get some missiles launched first"

Defense spending is being misused

Spending money on a war is inappropriate when current social and educational needs are not met

The author is not a pacifist and therefore does not believe in war

The author does not agree with war, and therefore argues for no more spending on the military