The institute/school has completed a thorough and candid analysis of their phase development  learning objectives for the SDP, considering measurability, clarity and what teacher/students need to know and implement to have space for creativity?

The leadership/faculty documented or proposed a process for meeting the phase development milestones  that are based on realistic and appropriate evidence?

The faculty documented or proposed specific plans to take best practices and appropriate benchmarks into account in the event of their training and coaching programs and bring to classroom implementation?

The faculty has been empowered to complete a thorough and candid analysis of the extent to which they collaborate effectively on the design of curriculum and planned improvements as per their understanding of Finnish Pedagogy?

The faculty feels confident and has proposed a plan for analyzing the content and sequencing of courses in terms of achieving student learning objectives?

The faculty has taken a lead to plan for the ongoing review of curriculum and co-curriculum based on appropriate evidence including comparison with best practices where appropriate.

The faculty has been able to  complete a thorough and candid analysis of their process for guiding and improving teaching and learning throughout the program?

The faculty documented or proposed a plan that promotes the effective use of student engagement methods and materials for activating student agency?

The faculty analyzed the extent to which there is true, ongoing Finnish collaboration in the design and delivery of the teaching and learning processes of the program?